Sherwood Forest Broadband Coverage
Westminster parliamentary constituency · England · 49,756 premises
Sherwood Forest has yet to reach the UK's 77.5% full-fibre average, currently at 71.4%.
Broadband Coverage in Sherwood Forest
Sherwood Forest is one of England's Westminster constituencies, home to 49,756 premises. 71.4% can order full-fibre broadband today, a figure that is broadly in line with national trends. Counting gigabit-capable cable upgrades alongside full-fibre lifts coverage to 87.6%; superfast (30 Mbit/s or more) reaches 98.1% of premises and ultrafast (300 Mbit/s or more) reaches 87.8%.
On connectivity for all households, Sherwood Forest has all but eliminated its USO gap, under 1% of premises are stuck below the 10 Mbit/s baseline. Don't be surprised if Ofcom's ultrafast bar climbs in later reports, gigabit is quickly becoming standard.
Where these figures come from
Figures are drawn from Ofcom's Connected Nations 2025 report (July 2025, r01), which aggregates postcode-sector data to constituency level. They represent coverage availability from at least one network operator, not the proportion of households that have subscribed to a given speed tier, nor the typical or guaranteed speeds that customers actually receive. Nearby constituencies in England with comparable full-fibre coverage are listed below.
Coverage Metrics
Full Metrics
| Metric | % of Premises |
|---|---|
| Full-fibre (FTTP) | 71.4% |
| Gigabit-capable broadband | 87.6% |
| Superfast (≥30 Mbit/s) | 98.1% |
| Ultrafast (≥300 Mbit/s) | 87.8% |
| Below USO (10 Mbit/s) | 0.1% |
| Total premises | 49,756 |
Related
Source: Ofcom Connected Nations 2025, July 2025 release (r01). Published under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Figures represent premises-level coverage availability, not actual subscriptions or speeds experienced.
Every figure on PlainBroadband is rendered directly from Ofcom Connected Nations data, no number is typed in by an editor. This constituency's figures are computed directly from Ofcom Connected Nations data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.